Bedroom Tax pre 1996 – Well done Liverpool City Council who finally get it right!

Earlier this week I posted that Liverpool City Council were wrongly reading the pre1996 exempt issue with regard to those other than partners who have succeeded to their tenancies in the last 18 years since 2 January 1996. They maintained ONLY the partner of the tenant could qualify for the pre 1996 exemption

Liverpool has now corrected this and very quickly too. In a matter of 6 days they read my email to them and responded by saying they would seek guidance from DWP, they have received that guidance and emailed me back saying I was right.  Yet this is not about my being proved right and I have heard only today that two other councils in Merseyside, namely Sefton and Knowsley, have also adoptedt he initial and now proven to be errant view Liverpool took.

So (a) 6 days is remarkably quick for any organisation and especially for a council and Liverpool rightly deserve credit for their speedy response and correction, and (b) Sefton, Knowsley and maybe more councils need to do the same.

The content of the email is unedited and below:

Further to my recent emails on succession and the under-occupation penalty. I can confirm that DWP has now provided further guidance which means that we are  able to extend exemptions to the under-occupation penalty for certain cases of succession to pre-1996 tenancies.

On the basis of previous advice from the DWP the Benefits Service has only been applying exemptions from the under occupation penalty to those who had inherited tenancies from their partner after the death of the tenant. 

We have reproduced the  DWP guidance below;  this now extends the exemption to any member of the claimant’s family.

DWP Guidance 

In order for the protection to be inherited four main conditions must apply as follows:

 •             Claimant must have taken over the protection from a previous beneficiary in respect of the same dwelling

•             The previous beneficiary must have left the dwelling, been imprisoned or died

•             The claimant must have claimed HB within four weeks

•             The claimant must either have been the partner of the previous beneficiary or  a linked person as follows:

-any member of the claimant’s family;

-if the claimant is a member of a polygamous marriage, any partners of his and any child or young person for whom he or a partner is responsible and who is a member of the same household;

-any relative of the claimant or his partner who occupies the same dwelling as the claimant, whether or not they reside with him, except for a relative who has a separate right of occupation of the dwelling which would enable them to continue to occupy it even if the claimant ceased his occupation of it.

Information on Cases Affected

We have contacted the social landlords in Liverpool to ensure that they provide the Benefits Service with details of any tenancies which may be affected.

We will also be examining our own records to help identify any cases affected.

So well done again Liverpool City Council and I trust Sefton and Knowsley Councils and others will act in a similar manner from now on and ensure that ALL the tenants who could benefit from the pre 1996 exemption from April 2013 to 3 March 2014 are sought and recompensed.

About these ads

3 thoughts on “Bedroom Tax pre 1996 – Well done Liverpool City Council who finally get it right!

  1. Sandra Martin March 21, 2014 at 1:27 pm Reply

    My daughter has just won her bedroom tax appeal on room size without going to tribunal using a template letter we found on your site. It only took two months. We would both like to thank you.

  2. Alison Godwin March 23, 2014 at 2:58 pm Reply

    I too won my appeal on the 1996 award only to be told that at the 3rd of March 2014 the loop hole will be closed by adding a clause to the 1996 ruling and therefore bedroom tax will be payable by all from then.

  3. Karen Hendry March 24, 2014 at 7:08 pm Reply

    is there a link anywhere to the amended dwp guidelines, iv been looking online and cant find anything and currently dealing with my mothers case with this v’s east ayrshire council as they have admitted her’s is a complex case and to be honest im doing their job for them around it grrr!

Please leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,043 other followers

%d bloggers like this: