Are bedroom tax arrears real?

Yesterday I released a post called “Informed Debate on HB legal issues” and ‘informed debate is a euphemism for oh sh*t we hadn’t thought of that! Today I ask for informed debate on arrears as I highlight an incredibly important issue with the bedroom tax – namely when are arrears actually arrears?

To explain imagine Mr Jones can’t pay his bedroom tax shortfall (the reasons are of no consequence.)  Mr Jones accrues arrears right?  Yes.  But what happens when Mr Jones appeals his bedroom tax decision? Still not following?

When a landlord takes possession action they issue a Notice of Seeking Possession or NSP which is a legal document and has to contain correct arrears amounts as well as having all the other ‘t’s crossed and ‘i’s dotted.  Yet if the landlord includes the bedroom tax shortfall as arrears then the NSP cannot be legally correct as the alleged bedroom tax arrears are being decided by another court, the tribunal. As such the actual arrears are not yet determined.

(a) So could or even should the district judge say on any arrears possession case taken legitimately by the landlord which involves bedroom tax ‘arrears’ that he has to adjourn the possession case as the arrears are not proven to be actual arrears and rather they are theoretical arrears?

(b) Would the district judge have any other option?

(c) I cannot see a position where a social landlord takes arrears cases for possession and does not include the ‘alleged’ bedroom tax arrears – the landlord can’t say £734.28 of ‘normal’ arrears plus a potential £250 of bedroom tax arrears in simple terms.

If there is validity in the above crude overview, which I suggest there is, then a nightmare scenario exists for the social landlord with regard to arrears and possession cases.

1. Even pre-existing arrears cases are affected if from April they include a bedroom tax shortfall element

2. The inveterate rent dodger – the tiny percentage of social tenants that arrears officers know pull every trick in the book to avoid possession – will use this aspect too.

3. Even if a DJ does afford possession in the first instance would a tenant then argue this is an eviction by oppression?

When you then look at and discover that the tribunal brochures say each formal appeal takes between 3 and 8 months to decide (and all indications are it is already longer than this) and the glut of bedroom tax appeals which adds to tribunals workloads will see this take longer. then the social landlord is faced with a massive arrears risk over the next year if a tenant appeals the bedroom tax.

When Lord Freud said that the bedroom tax will not hit social landlords bottom lines he clearly had not thought of this aspect – that arrears can be termed theoretical ones whilst an appeal is ongoing and social landlords will suffer significant financial loss over this.  It also highlights the ineptitude of the DWP estimating that 3% of social tenants will appeal and not a much higher figure that will happen.

Informed debate is needed yet this is just another critical matter that the DWP has not foreseen in its back of a fag packet bedroom tax policy.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Are bedroom tax arrears real?

  1. A decade ago I was in the unpleasent situation of being in arrears and facing eviction due to an ex partners poor handling of domestic finances. I wanted to keep my home so I paid the fee of £35 to challenge the notice in court.

    The first question the DJ asked the housing officers was “Are there any outstanding Housing Benefit payments, or any claims awaiting decision?”

    My guess is that if the answer had been yes he would have dismissed the eviction notice until the final decision from HB. I would deduce from this that if you are appealing BT then a DJ would not uphold an eviction notice until the final decision is made.

  2. Thank you for this Joe. I’ve been talking about theoretical arrears for weeks now. I was angry that one HA now has, on their website, ‘It’s up to you to make sure that your claim is accurate, with all the relevant documents. You are responsible for any debt that builds up in the meantime’.

    I can see scenarios where if they do get an eviction, the tenant wins an appeal so never owed the money, the HA will be wide open for a legal claim.
    The can of worms is getting bigger by the day.

    On a personal note, thanks for all the time consuming hard work you put in on our behalf.

    1. I would say yes. Even with Ground 8 arrears still have to be proven and while another court is hearing the bedroom tax appeal (the tribunal) no DJ can be satisfied that such claimed arrears are real

  3. Can I ask a question in relation to ground 8 – I understand it to be 8 weeks of arrears….. so is it 8 weeks of arrears (i.e. you have arrears mounted up over 8 weeks) or is is arrears to the total of 8 weeks worth of rent ( i.e. your rent needs to be the total costs of what full rent you pay over 8 weeks)?
    Thanks for your advice 🙂

Please leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s