Heres the proof people!!! The text of the U1 HB circular of 2014 which PROVES the DWP made an absolute cock up and the pre-1996 position does apply!!!
NOW it is up to everyone, tenant, landlord and council to find and let everyone know that they may be exempt from the bedroom tax.
Needs no more comment from me at this time except to say great news (and thanks to so many people who have worked on this) Peter Barker aka HB Anorak deserves a very special mention here and so many more though too many to mention.
I will unashamedly mention a local grassroots group Reclaim that I attend and help out with (email@example.com) who have worked tirelessly on this issue and have got details of many hundreds of tenants from all over the UK affected by this in the last week or so and scores and scores coming in by the day after raising awareness locally on BBC Radio Merseyside.
Anyway dear reader…ENJOY!
HB U1/2014 8 January 2014
|Contact||Queries about thebulletin in general, firstname.lastname@example.org
distribution of this bulletin, contact
|Who should read||All Housing Benefit (HB) staff|
Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy
- The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is aware that there are a small number of claimants who may be entitled to have their eligible rent calculated pursuant to paragraph 4(1)(a) of Schedule 3 of the Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2006 (Consequential Provisions Regulations) rather than the provisions which relate to the Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy (RSRS). The Department will however be taking steps to remedy this shortly.
- For these HB claimants the RSRS should not be applied if they under-occupy their property. Instead their eligible rent must be determined in accordance with regulations 12 and 13 as set out in paragraph 5 of Schedule 3 to the Consequential Provisions Regulations.
- For claimants to come within paragraph 4(1)(a) of Schedule 3 to the Consequential Provisions Regulations, they must have been continuously entitled to HB since at least 1 January 1996 and occupied the same dwelling since that date, save for any period where a fire, flood, explosion or natural catastrophe has rendered the property uninhabitable.
reaks in entitlement
4. The provisions outlined above continue to apply if there has been a break:
- in entitlement of no more than 4 weeks
- of entitlement of no more than 52 weeks, if the claimant or their partner is a welfare to work beneficiary
5. Note: it may be the case that the transitional protection has been inherited by a claimant and if so they should be treated the same.
Identifying affected claimants
6. Some claimants may already have contacted you about this and requested payment of arrears. However, many claimants will not be aware of this issue. You should therefore consider whether you are reasonably able to identify potentially affected claimants from your own records.
7. However if this situation comes to light local authorities (LAs) should not revise awards unless they are satisfied on the basis of evidence that the claimant satisfies the criteria.
Action to take with immediate effect
8. Once LAs are satisfied that a claimant’s eligible rent should not have been reduced the existing decision must be revised to remove the under-occupancy reduction in the claimant’s HB from 1 April 2013 until the legislation is amended.
9. This means that arrears of HB will be due from 1April 2013 to the date of reassessment.
10. You should also record details of affected cases so that once the legislation is amended they can be reassessed to reapply the under-occupancy reduction.
Crown Copyright 2014
Recipients may freely reproduce this bulletin.