Esther McVey must have a bedroom tax fur coat

Esther McVey merely talks pants and clearly she does not wear them else they would be on fire!  Yes its another of the bedroom tax bullshit stories emanating from McVey and probably a good reason why she doesn’t wear knickers though she clearly has a fur cost will all the spin (aka superficial bullshit) she comes out with

Today she has been extolling the bedroom tax and saying that it is working as it is freeing up properties and she is correct in that….except they are being freed up to remain empty and she only has to look at the largest social landlord in her Wirral constituency, Magenta Living.

In November at a public meeting held in Bromborough Wirral Magenta stated that before the bedroom tax came into operation they had about 15 or 16 empty properties (voids) that were 3 bedrooms or larger in size.  Yet by November 2013 just 7 months after the bedroom tax they had on average 160 empty 3 bed or larger properties.

Firstly, that is an eight to ten-fold increase.

Secondly, it is an increase in number of 145 3 bed or larger properties that on average are empty and for which no income is being received.  At an average of say £90 per week that is an additional rent loss of circa £700,000 per year ADDITIONAL rent loss to Magenta Living (formerly Wirral Partnership Homes, former Wirral Council Housing department.)

Of course the real loss is much more than that with Magenta (like all social landlords north of London) incurring higher costs of rent collection, higher costs of reletting every property, higher costs of additional staff in ‘welfare teams’ and in a number of other areas not least securing properties by tinning up…although like most landlords perspex rather than metal is the preferred option to escape housing blight.

Just over the water in Liverpool for example we see Cobalt Housing stating they are spending £2k more on each empty property in order to relet each property and such has been the level of empty properties there the landlord has managed to reduce the cost of perspex shutters to the cost of tinned ones!

However, back to McVey’s constituency in leafy Wirral.  I lived there for many years and Wirral has never before had any problem reletting social housing prior to the bedroom tax. Three bed and larger social housing properties available have always been as rare as hen’s teeth….until McVey’s bedroom tax policy.

The official HB figures also prove what is happening in leafy Wirral as I now demonstrate with May 2010 figure and compare with latest figures (for November 2013)

At the election

  • Wirral had 29,380 HB recipients
  • of which 16,660 were social tenants (57%) and
  • 12,720 private tenants (43%).

The latest figures show

  • Wirral has 31,494 HB recipients – an increase of 2,114
  • of which 16784 social tenants – a rise of 124 or 6% of the increase, and
  • 14709 private tenants – and increase of 1990 and 94% of the increase

The significance of the huge rise in private tenants is the cost to the public purse.  In Wirral a 3 bed private tenant receives £121.15 per week in LHA, the private sector version of HB.  This is 35% MORE in HB than a social tenant receives or about £31 per week more.

So £31 per week more multiplied by 1990 more private tenants is an ADDITIONAL £62,000 per week cost to the public purse or and ADDITIONAL £3.2 MILLION PER YEAR and that is just in Wirral alone….in McVey’s constituency in other words.

Now in the same Wirral we see 3797 bedroom tax households who have been deducted on average £749.73 each per year.  That means the bedroom tax has deducted £2.84 million from social tenants in Wirral ….Yes that’s the same Wirral that pays out £3.2m MORE in HB just to new private tenants!!

Now lets look at Wirral in terms of all private tenants.

As stated above we have 14,709 private tenants in receipt of HB and so if they each receive an average of just £25 per week more this means private tenants in McVey’s own constituency receive about

NINETEEN MILLION MORE PER YEAR IN HOUSING BENEFIT THAN IS PAID TO SOCIAL TENANTS IN WIRRAL.

Yes that would be £19m per year more than if these tenants lived in social housing.

So in today’s terms since the election McVeys own constituents in private rented housing have received £76 million more in additional housing benefit, that’s £76 million more in taxpayers money; £76m more to these private rented scroungers than to social housing scroungers and that’s just in Wirral.  Nationally the figure since the election is over EIGHT BILLION POUNDS MORE than social housing tenants have received.

Anyone think the bedroom tax and reducing social tenant’s HB is the real issue here that government should be looking at?   No I didn’t think so.

I needn’t ask whether anyone thinks McVey is being economical with the truth – that’s taken as a negative read dear reader given the lying virus that goes around DWP’s Caxton House – So anyone think that the government should be looking at private rented levels of HB which cost the country circa £2.2bn per year more than social housing …..Yes that same social housing McVey says is subsidised….which it is by £1.2bn per year or £1 BILLION a year less than the taxpayer gives to private landlords in added LHA costs over HB costs for private tenants.

Anyone care to remember last years English Housing Survey?  The EHS is the largest measure of housing in the UK and produced by government.  Yes the same one that said under occupation in social housing is a disgraceful 10 per cent…..oh and also said under occupation in private rented housing is sixty per cent higher at 16%!

Yes there is more under occupation in privately rented housing than there is in social housing!!

Funny how we never hear of that isn’t it reader and not just under occupation reader as there is more overcrowding in social housing than in privately rented housing too!  Here is what the EHS says:

There was no significant change in overcrowding rates since 2010-11 for owner occupiers (1%), social renters (7%) or private renters (6%). Rates of under-occupation remained substantially higher in the owner occupied sector (49%) than in both the social rented sector (10%) and private rented sector (16%).

 

See social housing has more overcrowding at 7% compared with 6% in private housing.  Yes and this government have been saying the bedroom tax is all about getting social tenants to downsize so poor downtrodden overcrowded private tenants can move in there!  What was that reader you have been fed a pack of lies by the propaganda of this government?  Yes of course you have, that is what governments do but especially this one and especially in this back of a fag packet bedroom tax policy.

Yes dear reader it is clear that McVey must have a fur coat!!

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “Esther McVey must have a bedroom tax fur coat

  1. She also said on a BBC interview earlier today that Housing Benefit had doubled to 24 billion under Labour. Another blatant lie! Housing Be
    nefit was at 20 billion in 2010 when the coalition came to power. It is NOW 24 billion, an increase of 4 billion in under 4 years.

  2. The likes of McVey couldn’t put 2 and 2 together, so how she would read statistics is a mystery. If she can’t see that she is talking about a tax that is not only leaving people in financial messes, overcrowding and the amount of money that is being spent on properties that are now empty because of the bedroom tax, then she ought to be sacked for incompetence!
    I’m a private renter and only get HB at the single bedroom rate, even though we rent a 2 bed bungalow and have to have that extra room as we are both disabled and disturb each other continually, we are still told that we only need one bedroom!
    I wish McVey could be put in a cannon and shot into space – but no-where near the space station as she’d tax that as well.

  3. It isn’t a bedroom tax, or an under-occupancy surcharge, or any of the other cleverly designed misnomers invented by Tory/LibDem spin-doctors – it is simply a poor-tax: a tax on the poor by a vindictive coalition government.
    A tax on the poor, aimed at the poor, administered by the rich and wealthy.
    A tax on the poor for having the audacity of being poor!

  4. Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating and commented:
    Excellent post Joe, readers will certainly see the futility of this bedroom tax and the real reasons why these Tories brought it in.
    Nothing to do with austerity,or overcrowding,or fair housing at all, just another excuse to punish those on welfare or housing benefit in social housing.

  5. Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented:
    These figures need to be broadcast far and wide. 19m being paid out in private housing than the cost would be for social housing. Let alone the cost in misery and lives. Bedroom tax one year on protest day – 5th April!! We need to get this one really put to bed!

  6. They tell us The Economy is picking up and can produce figures in 3 month intervals,(probably Lies)
    They tell us how much Osbourne has borrowed to help the economy (probably MORE Lies)
    they tell us the jobless figures are going up or down in 3 month intervals,yet EVEN MORE Lies

    BUT cant tell us how much they have saved in Bedroom Tax over the past 12 months
    The Truth is nothing is saved
    30,000 downsized yet Employment Minister Esther McVey said the government was “on track” to reach its target of 30% by 2017 has she taken up Comedy in her spare time…

  7. Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
    SPeye Joe presents some utterly damning statistics showing the way the bedroom tax has effected Wirral. There’s an increase in social housing lying empty, and an increase in overcrowding in the private sector, as well as a massive increase in the amount of housing benefit paid out. This time its going on the far larger rents in the private sector. For SPeye Joe, this shows that not only isn’t the Bedroom Tax doing what it is claimed, but also that Esther McVey is being more than somewhat economical with the truth when she says it does. But then, I don’t think the Bedroom Tax was ever solely about saving money. Like the rest of the government’s policies, it’s about transferring wealth to the private sector, so they can profit from and exploit the poor.

  8. As usual, it was the failure of the so-called TV ‘interviewers’ to challenge her lies that most bugged me. We know before they open their mouths that McVey et al are going to spout a huge pack of lies about the bedroom tax – it’s the fact that they are allowed, so publically, to get away with it that I can’t stand!

  9. OMG only just seen this, it should be broadcast far and wide !
    I seen the said woman with my brother who has shared custody of his child, she told him “if you can’t afford the tax, get 1 bedroom and sleep on the coach”
    wonder why she wasn’t re-elected? hmmm

Please leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s