Scooby Doo investigates the bedroom tax and IDS

We have stopped the burgeoning welfare benefit spend the country cant afford chirps IDS ad infinitum

dwpspend97to2013

 

We have cut Housing Benefit spend with the Bedroom tax and Benefit Cap (blah blah blah)

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

It is only workless scroungers who claim Housing Benefit (blah blah blah) Here’s a graph of those in work and claiming HB!

%ofworkign tenants on HB

Oh by the way dear reader all the above simple graphs come form figures produced by …Yes you’ve guessed it IDS’s own Department of Work & Pensions.  Would you like a few more?  Oh ok then!

What about we can’t afford the burgeoning welfare state argument (blah blah blah) How much do we in the UK spend as a percentage of our GDP compared to other European (boo hiss!) countries.  The Economist tells us:

_71423324_social_security_expenditure_464gr(3)

 

Yes those well known welfare benefit spendthrifts the Germans can manage to afford to send 12% more than the UK on their welfare state.

Surely then the Germans must be taxed more to afford this largesse on welfare benefits. Lets’s see what the Economist says on that:

effective tax rates on £100pa

As you can see the Germans pay the same effective tax rates but receive more in employee social security

You care for some more lies IDS’s DWP says about welfare benefit spend?  Here is what they said this week after they released the allegedly independent report into the bedroom tax

dwpliesover interim report

 

And here again in a form so simple even DWP can not misunderstand is the official DWP figures for the Housing Benefit spend

coalition hb bill

Can you spot the hidden £6bn HB savings the DWP claim? No neither can I!!

What about the head honcho himself the Prime Minister as he is not afraid of throwing in some whopping porkies.  You will recall numerous occasions that Cameron has said the disabled are exempt from the bedroom tax. Try here and here for example.  So if Cameron is not fibbing through his hat can you tell me why the bedroom tax report this week had this nice little pie chart?  It shows that local councils take into account the disabled claimants DLA as income in whether to award a DHP to mitigate the bedroom tax!  Yes that’s the same disabled applicant who Cameron tells us is exempt from the bedroom tax so why are they applying for a DHP then Prime Minister?

dlaasincomefor DHP

 

Do you recall read reader IDS and Lord Freud saying only a small number of vulnerable households had the bedroom tax wrongly imposed?  Their estimate was between 3,000 and 5,000 in total across the country when research from a FOI request revealed their was likely to be over 40,000 households affected – the same as I predicted.  Has the coalition ever released the final figure? Has the Labour Party forgotten to follow this up and tell us just how many vulnerable households had the bedroom tax wrongly imposed?

Here is an oldish graph which compares actual figures (which will have risen) compared with the DWP estimates:

 

PRE96EXEMPT

 

But then what is a bedroom and what is under occupying?  On that latter point see this from the then Housing Minister Grant Shapps as Hansard recalls:

shappsbedroom

“Under-occupying households are those with at least TWO bedrooms more than they need..”  Yes that does say TWO dear reader!

So what is a bedroom?  Oh yes the DWP steadfastly refuse to define that don’t they? They also say outside of a kitchen, bathroom and living room that all rooms must be bedrooms.  Yes that’s the same DWP who administer other welfare benefits such as Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) or dole.  And looky here what the JSA Online claim form says: –

JSAO2 other

Yes the same DWP allows the claimant to have rooms other than bedrooms and even offers STUDY or UTILITY ROOM or a PLAYROOM as an example of what a claimant may legitimately have in their property. Yet woe betide the HB claimant who says a disputed room is not a bedroom its a study eh!

Ah cake and eating it dear reader? Why of course that’s the case!

awileystairlift1 awverticallift1 awverticallift2Yes the 3 pictures above are a bedroom according to DWP and the local authority in this case Sefton MBC …and because the tenancy agreement and the landlord says so.  Of course a bed could not even fit into this room but hey the landlords asset register which they transmitted to the council had not been updated with the vertical lift taking out one of the former bedrooms.

Yes dear reader that is the basis on which the bedroom tax decisions were taken and one other council Bury MBC kindly revealed precisely what information they got back from landlords and the entirety of how their decisions were taken was commonplace across all councils in the UK

burydetailfromlandlord

Hard to believe that a family’s life has been turned upside down with the life changing bedroom tax decisions based on the above isn’t it?  Well that’s the stark reality dear reader!

I could go on and on with this pictorial representation of the bedroom tax.  But I will finish (for now) with an excerpt from the Welsh Quality Housing Standard below.

Note this is just a pointer as is the Housing Acts of 1985, 1988 and 2004 over what constitutes the term ‘bedroom’ in terms of floor size. Just a pointer dear reader yet in the absence and steadfast refusal of DWP to define the term bedroom we are left with Tribunal judges having to determine what the term ‘bedroom’ means and the diagram below does help in that regard by giving accurate dimensions of a bed, bedside cabinet, dressing tables and wardrobes – the usual and normal furnishings which make a room a bedroom – and the necessary space needed between these necessary furnishings too.

whqs bedroom

 

 

I was going to conclude with some words here.  Yet words can be ambiguous and downright misleading cant they IDS…you know as in the “I believe it to be right” piffle you spout when the likes of the ONS and NAO find you and your DWP mislead, dissemble and overtly and knowingly lie.

If a picture paints a thousand words then each one is 3 letters long begins with L ends in E and has I in the middle when it comes to your version of the bedroom tax and welfare reforms.

Let’s unmask the villain here and think of Scooby Doo – IDS would have gotten away with it if it wasn’t for those pesky facts!!

 

 

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “Scooby Doo investigates the bedroom tax and IDS

  1. I would liken the current government regime to be closer to nazi germany than the united states. Their darwinian “survival of the richest” politics and elitist views have led to the outright opression of the poorest in our society is akin to that of the third reich’s persecution of the jews and disabled who were viewed by the nazi’s as a weak link in the german nation. Is the tories plan to subjugate and starve the working class, elderly and disabled until they die out? Leaving only their social class to rule britain? Last I checked it was illegal to discriminate against groups of people based on age, disabilty or culture. I a$ surprised that their thinly veiled “reforms” have not sparked a criminal investigation… Then again when you control the bodies meant to protect us you can get away with anything… Next thing you know we will be discovering that the tories swept a parliamentary peadophile ring under the carpet…

  2. The x and y axes of the graphs are not labelled so it is not easy to know what exactly we are looking at with regard to some of the graphs.
    I believe the population of the UK has increased from 59 million in 2001 to 63 million in 2011, an increase of around 4 million.
    Has this increased population been factored into the various calculations on offer?
    I do not believe the coalition government can be compared with Nazi Germany.
    I do not believe they have a deliberate policy of oppressing or cleansing anyone.
    What they are absolutely committed to – like Thatcher before them – is to diminish state costs to the benefit of the most powerful and wealthy in our society.
    They just don’t care about the less well-off; they leave church food banks to care for them.
    I think Labour is not challenging IDS and the DWP because it suits Labour for these measures to proceed as they anticipate continuing them after forming the next government.
    I hope I am wrong and that a new Labour government will look after the less well-off far better than the present coalition government, though – frankly – I doubt it.
    Who else – apart from the Greens – is there to vote for?

  3. I can only hope and pray that Scotland votes for Independence – there is no other hope for me or mine if they stay with the Union. We have to get away from what is going to happen in the next election where a coalition between the Tories and Ukip will begin. God help us all…

  4. Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
    SPeye Joe gives you more facts and figures from the government’s own stats to show that their reasons for cutting the welfare state are lies. He also gives you the hard facts and figures to show that Cameron is lying when he said that the Bedroom Tax wouldn’t apply to the disabled, and the facts, figures and even photographic evidence to show that not every spare room can be legally construed as a bedroom, no matter how local councils may be required to consider them by the DWP.

  5. This whole issue is totally unbelievable and at the same time totally believable. How can that be? Maybe it’s because ‘normal’ people can’t believe this could happen, and yet when we think of Government officials we always expect this type of thing. It’s all so wrong there are no more words to describe it.
    Trish

Please leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s